August 1, 2008

truth beauty

truthbeauty0807.jpg

Posted by hugh macleod at August 1, 2008 6:58 AM | TrackBack
Comments

are we aiming for the point in the middle or to experience the bits at the extremes in disconnected nuggets? and, in any case, I'm not sure if there isn't a place/space/thing where all of these coincide at their maximum... but then i could be deluded :)

Posted by: Andre Ling at August 1, 2008 8:12 AM

Um.. this is a pretty confusing division.. probably a more "postmodern" (or economic) approach to the classical unity.

Personally I'd say that the truth and beauty division is pretty doesn't really hold. I mean beauty is really just another aspect of truth - as in a general "rightness" of things, or as justice, reality.

But then again one often talks about "the ugly truth".. but I think here we can get to the bottom of it: truth is beautiful, but it uncovers (shows) the actual state of affairs (the actual form of something) - which is usually pretty gruesome.

I think what's crucial here is what objects can be placed within this space - goods would fit, art would not. You could make a 3D graph of this with cost as the z axis.. and then map possible product form/function/truth/beauty levels for different price ranges..

Posted by: =8)-DX at August 1, 2008 8:45 AM

'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,-that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'
- John Keats

Posted by: Maarten Spreij at August 1, 2008 11:33 AM

Reminds me of a Star Trek episode entitled "Is There In Truth No Beauty?", a title which probably came from some piece of classic literature which I can't name.

Posted by: Mark Dykeman at August 4, 2008 12:31 PM