March 1, 2006

evil cartoon spree

Prasad is not pleased:

Hugh's gapingvoid, was, until a few days back a fun site with good marketing/blogging ideas sprinkled with some wonderful dry satire cartoons. Recently, he's been on a cartoon spree, and most of them are dry without his trademark satire, don't have that roughness or rudeness or arrogance or irreverence that he's known for. The spate of cartoons are tamed versions of inane ideas. I don't know what struck him or who he's dating...
Posted by hugh macleod at March 1, 2006 11:00 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Couldn't disgaree more. Back and better than ever, IMHO. Bring on the t-shirts. And what DID happen to those fine art prints? Sorry if I missed it.

Posted by: pieman at March 1, 2006 11:35 AM

Oh well. One opinion from Prasad. Not shared by me.
   I’m sure it’s just a difference in our senses of humour.

Posted by: Jack Yan at March 1, 2006 11:59 AM

Harsh

It's called getting a new toy and experimenting.

He must have missed the cartoons where you said it sucks that people matter, checking your ego at the door will never happen, and having a soul while working for a large company would only get in the way.

Two words.. Link Bait.

...and it worked!

Posted by: Brad Fitzpatrick at March 1, 2006 12:07 PM

Stay ahead of the game Hugh...
Play to your hearts content,
"Even a blind hen finds a corn now and again...!"

Posted by: Philip Stanley at March 1, 2006 12:32 PM

Yep, some folks can't stand to see someone having a good time.

Posted by: Bill & Misty Olen at March 1, 2006 12:47 PM

maybe it's because of his new tablet pc?

Posted by: or at March 1, 2006 12:56 PM

..that releases creativity..

Posted by: Philip Stanley at March 1, 2006 1:16 PM

Don't take it personal, Hugh... I guess what he ment we kind of miss the words.
If it was just experimenting with the cool new toy, it's cool. But if your blog turns into a drawing-blog, then it would be a bit sad..
I believe that although a picture/drawing is worth a hundred words, it still needs another hundred words to make the story worth telling.

Posted by: Alex at March 1, 2006 1:34 PM

I wouldn't worry too much about criticism from a guy who calls himself "nonentity". I used to come here for the cartoons back in the day (found it via a FARK.com ad). Then I forgot about the site for a while and came back to the wine, and the suits, and the marketing-speak - and wondered if I was at the right site (though I'm a big fan of marketing-speak so I've been sticking around). Is it time for two blogs?

Posted by: Jeff Chausse at March 1, 2006 1:46 PM

I agree that the newer stuff lacks some of the edge - even though I like some of them. But sheesh - give the guy a break. He's playing with a new toy.

But it illustrates how the web is different from intermediated media. The good news/bad news about the web vs an edited publication [can you imagine us not seeing Hugh's stuff unless it got in the British equivalent of the New Yorker?] is that it's so easy to "publish" that lots of practice and trial and not-ready-for-prime-time stuff gets out. If readers feel there too much noise to signal ratio they stop reading. So it's poster beware rather than consumer beware.

Posted by: John Seiffer at March 1, 2006 2:16 PM

I agree with him. The cartoon deluge lately has been incredibly lame with maybe 1 of them being mildly amusing. I love that you have a new toy, but use the power for good.

The cartoons are like chocolate cake. Eat too much at once and you become sick of it.

Posted by: Warren at March 1, 2006 2:34 PM

I've been a visitor for a while. Have been influenced enough to watch "Young Adam" read "Cluetrain Manifesto" can't get the wine here in the states though. I'm not sure how much I like style of cartoons lately but its taking a chance that leads to all things good.

Posted by: Scott at March 1, 2006 2:37 PM

It's unlikely that you'll be able to make *everyone* happy all at once, if that's even a goal... Some like the cartoons, some like the text, some like both. Great.

I suppose you could title your posts to differentiate the two, as in

Cartoon: clicking on a mouse
Text: malcolm gladwell has a blog

Or, you could offer two feeds easily enough.

Or, people could just stop chewing you out for failing to live up to their personal expectations when they read the excellent content you're giving them for free.

Reader feedback is a good thing, but it's still just one person's opinion. Rock on.

(BTW: I'm really quite happy with the new spate of cartoons. Those who think "they've lost the edge" should go back to the archives and look again. I think they're romanticising the past... the new cartoons seem to me to have about the same mix of edgy, happy and purely graphic.)

Posted by: john t unger at March 1, 2006 2:46 PM

I liked the cartoon spree.

Posted by: Bjorn at March 1, 2006 3:18 PM

Humph. No slack at all. For my part I already sang praises to your new work. It's edgier and more emotionally hard hitting than ever in my opinion. Oh well. "Each to his own boys. I likes mine...raw."

Posted by: Andrew Toomey at March 1, 2006 3:35 PM

I have to agree with Brad, I see it as experimenting with a new toy. While there have been some decent ones and some bad, it is an experimenting phase.

Posted by: Thomas at March 1, 2006 3:55 PM

Any time you do anything new/different, you get flak. I'm not worried.

Posted by: Hugh MacLeod at March 1, 2006 4:15 PM

I just kind of figured you were sharing all of your practice crap, and putting it somewhere where you can find it later if you needed it. It's kind of neat to see your process, personally. But maybe it takes a fellow cartoonist to appreciate that without some sort of explaination.

Posted by: Fenmere, the Worm at March 1, 2006 4:18 PM

I think the new ones are better, to be honest, than all the bitter stuff.

If someone started a blog and threw up similar drawings, it probably wouldn't attract much interest, but because all of us have seen your style develop over time, it becomes art.

Posted by: Peter Cooper at March 1, 2006 4:31 PM

Hmmm.... way back in the day, Hugh posted a list of "How to be creative" tips. One of the key ideas from that list was that experimenting is good, and worrying about what other people think is bad. I'm glad to see he's getting back to his roots.

Posted by: Katherine at March 1, 2006 4:52 PM

Hugh's not here to comfort the disturbed but to disturb the comfortable.

Posted by: Dennis Howlett at March 1, 2006 4:56 PM

"Hugh's not here to comfort the disturbed but to disturb the comfortable."

Right, rah-rah-rah, purple cow and catch phrases and all that but the cartoons used to mean something. When I saw one on the blog, I sat up and paid attention because it was likely a wry observation of some kind about a current issue or a biting comment about some aspect of marketing.

This flood has none of that charm.

Posted by: Warren at March 1, 2006 5:12 PM

Nice thought Katherine

Posted by: Brad Fitzpatrick at March 1, 2006 6:00 PM

Hell, I only read Hugh for the cartoons. ;)

Posted by: gia at March 1, 2006 7:22 PM

How dare you do whatever you want on your own blog? Pander, damn you! Pander!

Posted by: Ryan at March 1, 2006 8:21 PM

I came here mostly for the cartoons

Posted by: triesti at March 1, 2006 8:56 PM

Re: 'How dare you do whatever you want on your own blog? Pander, damn you! Pander!'

Please turn that into a cartoon! I want that on blogcards! (Though without the 'on your blog...')

Posted by: Mark H at March 1, 2006 9:40 PM

When I checked in the other day, my first thought was "ooh, cool, color!"

NO DAMMIT I'M NOT ALLOWED TO JUST ENJOY THE COLOR, I HAVE TO BE CYNICAL AND SAY YOU SOLD OUT OR SOMETHING

Please. Carry on. Do what thou wilt.

Posted by: Keith Handy at March 1, 2006 10:18 PM

I love some of them. Corporate Soul...Higher Beings. Good stuff!

(How do you handle so much critique?)

Posted by: Tracy at March 2, 2006 2:56 AM

Hugh,
Looks like my post served as a trigger to let you know that there are many who love your new experiment.

I acknowledge a weakness from my side: I have come to expect a certain type of humour-idea blend from you and when you depart from your style, I (and readers who share my taste) have to make mental adjustments to look & grasp your new spate of cartoons with a fresh pair of eyes to appreciate/enjoy them... and that's serious effort. But try, I will.

Still, if this experiment is an indication of your future course, I'd say "there's nothing like good old days!!".

Posted by: Prasad at March 2, 2006 6:25 AM

Bah.

The cartoons ROCK!

Posted by: YaaL at March 2, 2006 1:30 PM

Go ahead - tell him who you're dating.

Posted by: bbm at March 2, 2006 2:17 PM

It's premature to complain about changes to the cartoons. It's also premature to dismiss the complaints as simple fear of change, 'cause in this case the fear of change is quite complex.

We liked what we were getting, and now we're getting more for a while, at least until Hugh's enthusiasm for his new tool dies down a bit. When it does, I'm sure that he'll be doing cartoons to match "My cock is mighty" and "Complete Fucking Asshole" soon enough.

Hell, he's almost there already. "Having a soul would just get in the way" is a good example -- if you remove the first sentence, it's on par with the quality of visual poetry I've come to expect from gapingvoid. Some of the new stuff is a little overtly snarky for my taste.

[Disclosure: I am neither a wine drinker, nor am I ever likely to buy a $3000 suit.]

That being said, I am interested in seeing Hugh's sketches. They're not hurting anybody, yet.

Posted by: Another Brad at March 2, 2006 5:17 PM

I second this request, I need new cards :):

Re: 'How dare you do whatever you want on your own blog? Pander, damn you! Pander!'

Please turn that into a cartoon! I want that on blogcards! (Though without the 'on your blog...')
Posted by: Mark H at March 1, 2006 09:40 PM

Posted by: Niti Bhan at March 3, 2006 3:14 AM

I come here for the cartoons.
And the wit.
And then the cartoons some more.

Really, to complain that you don't like what someone's done with the place-it only works if you're complaining to the decorator who just redid your living room.

Posted by: MadameD at March 3, 2006 4:05 AM