
For my presentation at LIFT, I'll be citing the following links:
The Hughtrain. ""THE MARKET FOR SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN IS INFINITE."
The Global Microbrand. "There are thousands of reasons why people write blogs. But it seems to me the biggest reason that drives the bloggers I read the most is, we're all looking for our own personal global microbrand. That is the prize. That is the ticket off the treadmill. And I don't think it's a bad one to aim for."
The Stormhoek Meme. "Blogging as a marketing tool is easier when you think of it as a chemical catalyst, not as a hammer and nail." [Bonus Link: The Stormhoek bloggers wiki page.]
English Cut. "How to create a global microbrand on a taco-stand budget." A Savile Row tailor starts a blog.
"The Porous Membrane." Why corporate blogging works.
"Bernbach was Wrong." The best advertising is not "Word Of Mouth", but "Disrupting Markets".
Bloggers Intro. "Rather than just rattling off a laundry list what to do, instead I'm going to give you a list of bloggers who I rate highly. Read them reguarly, and after a while you should discover why what they do works so well."
[NOTE TO SELF:] A lot of marketing people seem to be hoping for a proven blogging method that is (A) invented by somebody else, (B) easy to replicate, (C) easy to implement, and (D) easy to sell to their boss. Good luck.
[FURTHER READING:]
[KOOL-AID:] "Naked Conversations on a Bus." Kathy Sierra's marvellous post on why blogging works.My presentation is Friday at 10.40am.[KOOL-AID WITH EXTRA SUGAR:] Robert Scoble's "Corporate Blogging Manifesto".
[KOOL-AID WITH EXTRA SUGAR AND STEROIDS:] The Cluetrain Manifesto. The book that started it all.
[FOOD FOR THOUGHT:] Seth Godin's "Small Is The New Big".

On my radar today:
1. More "Web 2.0" filler from SFGate.
2. Stowe Boyd fisks Rick Segal, kinda sorta.
[RELATED:] A very salient point from Scoble:
Another criticism I saw of my post yesterday? That ideas aren’t what’s needed. I hear this all the time “ideas are cheap, implementation is expensive.”Amen, Scoble.Oh, really? How many of you thought up RSS? How many of you thought up Flickr? If ideas are so cheap, where’s the new ideas? I don’t see that many being put out there. And, inside big companies I get to see idea generation at work. They simply aren’t there.
3. This got me thinking: A commenter on the Stormhoek blog poses the question:
You're clearly interested in the feedback to the blog yet there seem to be very few comments here. Do you all read all the comments about Stormhoek on gapingvoid?To which Jason replies:
Thanks John, yes, we generally do read all of the comments on Gapingvoid and as many as we can on other people's blogs. As you noted, much of the conversation about Stormhoek takes place off this blog.The point of what we're doing is not getting people to leave comments on a certain URL. The point of what we're doing is selling wine.Lots of people seem to think that blogging needs to about discussions that take place on their blog, but we find that we get most of our 'action' on other peoples', with Gapingvoid being just one of them. Search Technorati, for example, and you will see many hundreds of posts.
Which makes me ask the question: When does blogging become something else? When does it become "not blogging"?
[GOOD ANSWER:] From OneByOne Media:
Simply, blogging becomes transmogrified into a “conversation” and then the ripples in the pond grow from there. A blog is merely the stone cast into the pool.4. Just got off the phone with a journalist from this paper. Asking me about blogs. Main point: Blogs won't put newspaper out of business, they'll make them better. This is simply because when your competition is doing it for free, you'd better be good. The papers that don't understand this will die, and nobody will care.
5. About to go pack; I'm flying to Geneva tomorrow for the LIFT conference. Hope to see you there.

[Haven't posted this cartoon for a while. It's one of my favorites.]
The Artic Monkeys make pop music history by having the fastest-selling British single since The Beatles.
Whatever People Say I Am, That’s What I’m Not reached the top of the charts after recording 363,735 over-the-counter sales during its first week of release. Album downloads from iTunes and other online stores, which have not yet been included in the tally, are likely to push the opening sales past 400,000.A few months ago I made the comment that the best advertising was not Word-Of-Mouth, as commonly believed, but "Disrupting Markets".
The Artic Monkeys prove the point. They bypassed the music industry entirely, relying instead on the internet, free downloads, playing live gigs and Word-Of-Mouth.
Word-Of-Mouth was not a thing in itself. Word-Of-Mouth was a subset of something much larger going on. The Market. Disrupted. Etcetera.
By changing the rules of the game, people wanted to tell their story. That includes people like me, who have close to zero interest in pop records. Yet here I am, talking about it. Helping to sell their records, even if I don't buy one myself.
Without market disruption, there is no marketing.
Ergo, all marketing is disruption. Everything else is secondary.
[REQUIRED READING:] "Small is the New Big" by Seth Godin. Read it fifteen times if you haven't already.
Technorati has now reached over 26 million blogs.
What does this mean? I have no idea. Depends how much you're personally invested in the whole blogging thing working out.
Here's the Memeorandum link for the whole "Venture Capital 2.0" thread.
All of the people cited there are worth reading. Check it out.
So far I'm not seeing any seismic shift in the VC industry. I'm just seeing some intellectual growing pains going on. Fair enough.
[NEWSFLASH:] Everybody's favorite fashion model, Anina has been told by her agency to stop blogging.
Another dinosaur doing a power move etc. Sucks.
Stormhoek makes an appearance at Barcamp Dallas.
Kudos to David Parmet and Brian Oberkirch for making it happen
[Bonus Link:] Rick Segal speaks more about his "Venture Captial 2.0" idea. Rick is up to something, this post sheds a little more light on the subject etc. [Also see:] Dave Winer: "How To Reform The VC Industry". I can't decide if I love or hate this idea. Blogshares with real money. Who knows?

English Cut gets a nice mention today in The Sunday Telegraph, one of the big UK papers.
It's an article about Prince Charles no longer wearing "bespoke", instead opting for the cheaper "made-to-measure".
Two points of personal interest:
[1] Thomas is cited as "one of Britain's most respected tailors, who made Prince Charles's suits for three years..."
[2] Thomas is quoted directly:
"Twenty years ago - when he was wearing Anderson & Sheppard - he looked so elegant. But in the photograph two months ago he looked bloody awful in a made-to-measure suit."I'm not sure if describing the Prince's dress sense as "bloody awful" is good PR for us. Maybe, maybe not. But being called "one of Britain's most respected tailors" from a national Establishment newspaper isn't exactly bad news.
[BACKGROUND: Thomas used to work for Anderson & Sheppard, as undercutter to the great Dennis Halberry. While there he was also the main cutter for their most important client i.e. Prince Charles.]
Fraser Kelton has an excellent post on the challenges facing the venture business up on his Disruptive Thoughts blog.Fred also adds this thought:
I would suggest one rule and only one. Be the entrepreneur's partner. Help him or her. Be there for them. Support them. Counsel them. Share the risk with them. Have fun with them. Laugh and cry with them. And make boatloads of money with them. It's a time tested formula and it will work forever.Ok, so what sayest Rick Segal And Doc Searls?
[Rick and Doc are having an ongoing conversation about how the venture capital business can work in a "Web 2.0" envirionment, when large helpings of cash aren't always needed. How then does a VC add value, if his main raison d'etre [i.e. Cash] is not needed in the equation?]

So one of the people over at Stormhoek told this to me:
The Stormhoek boys were having a meeting with one of their largest customers, a UK supermarket chain.
After a long presentation explaining what they were trying to do with the blogosphere, an exec at the supermarket called it nothing more than "Chatroom Rubbish".
The guy obviously doesn't get it. So they sent him a paperback copy of The Cluetrain in the hope that it provides him some food for thought.
In supermarkets, everything is a commodity- the management, the products, the customers, the suppliers, the employees, and of course, the supermarket itself.
It's interesting to me that a exec in a commodity business would describe conversations between people who spend money in their stores as "Chatroom Rubbish".
Interesting, but not surprising.
I call this phenomenon "Running up against the Commodity Wall". We bloggers are already very used to it.
One thought - and it's one that came from a recent discussion - is the VC is even needed within the Web 2.0 environment. If you can develop and distribute a new application/service with little capital, what roles do VCs get to play if they can't bring money to the table? Maybe this is what Rick is working on.Enquiring minds want to know- is there something afoot in the Venture Capital business? What sayest Fred Wilson?
Blog Goddess Elizabeth Spiers is launching a new blog this March.
Gawker, her former employer, snarks about it.
People forget how influential Gawker was back when Spiers and Denton first launched it.

Like I said earlier, the folks at Stormhoek are crafting some in-store retail promos for major UK retailers.
Here's our idea: Because of our thing we've got going with the blogosphere, we think it would be a fun idea to maybe cross-promote a "Web 2.0" products in the promo. Something on a case card or on the bottle? Counter display? That kinda thing.
[1.] The offer would be seen by millions of mainstream UK wine drinkers.
[2.] Ten dollar wine people would seem to be the perfect target for a lot of techie offers, methinks.
Anybody have or know of some products they would like to see promoted in the UK? Software, hardware, geek toys, websites, it doesn't matter.
Drop me an e-mail and let's talk about it. Thanks.

"How To Be Creative", a 10,000-word blog post I wrote a year and a half ago, just got picked up by Digg.
So far, it's been "Dugg" 1,097 times. Is that a lot? I don't know much about how Digg works.
[Thanks to Jose for the pointer.]

[PODCAST:] Johnnie Moore and James Cherkoff interview Jason Korman from Stormhoek.
Nice to get another perspective on it from someone close to the business. Jason, Johnnie and James all had some fascinating thoughts about it.
NB: Johnnie and James do this thing called the "Open Sauce Workshop" which is really interesting.
From the highest-spending brands, to the smallest agencies, everyone is wondering how to succeed in a brave new world of marketing.[BACKGROUND STORY:] "Blogging doubles Stormhoek sales in less than twelve months."It's a world where people are better informed, better connected and have more choice. Where the media are increasingly fragmented.
Open Sauce workshops are a lively, practical way to get to grips with this world.
Seems a new conversation is starting about Venture Capital between two of the smartest people I know, Doc Searls and Rick Segal. Click on their respective links to find out more. Interesting stuff.
[Bonus Link:] Web 2.0 is dead, it's official. Not that it was ever that alive to begin with [Thanks to Fred for the link].

Thomas is down in London today, talking to a shirt manufacturer.
The current plan:
1. Make a limited number of insanely expensive bespoke suits every year.There's an interplay here between the quality of the suits, the quality of the shirts, the dialogue happening on Thomas' blog and the actual shirtmaker who manufactures for us.2. Make an unlimited number of insanely expensive shirts every year, selling via an e-commerce website.
3. Forget massive retail operations and extensive line extensions. Just focus on a few core items, and make it easy for people to shop online.
4. Keep it all "Made in England".
A reader left the following comment on English Cut:
Fascinating post as usual. I get such an education reading this site. For those of us who grew up well outside the realm of Savile Row, it feels like secret society information is regularly dispensed here. I'm sure your blog is doing more Savile Row and Jermyn Street than anything else for a century. I think you really fill a need for people who want the best, but have remained ignorant in the dark surroundings of today's popular culture. Thank you for lighting the way for us.If that's not our target market, I don't know who is. Somebody who wants the best, enjoys learning about it, but still doesn't want a lot of fuss.
A far cry from the commodified, fashionista hell hole that is contemporary luxury retail.

[Bonus Link:] Russell posts his favorite gapingvoid cartoons. Thanks, Russell!

[Bonus Link:] I've been nominated for a "Bloggie" award, under the "Best British Blog" category. Cool.
How To Do What You Love.Also from Paul:To do something well you have to like it. That idea is not exactly novel. We've got it down to four words: "Do what you love." But it's not enough just to tell people that. Doing what you love is complicated.
A Unifed Theory of VC Suckage.[Hat tip to Gavin Bowman for the link.]The problem with VC funds is that they're funds. Like the managers of mutual funds or hedge funds, VCs get paid a percentage of the money they manage: about 2% a year in management fees, plus a percentage of the gains. So they want the fund to be huge-- hundreds of millions of dollars, if possible. But that means each partner ends up being responsible for investing a lot of money. And since one person can only manage so many deals, each deal has to be for multiple millions of dollars.

The English Cut $300 shirt story is moving along quickly.
We've been talking to lots of shirtmaking people. Going well. Looks like we'll be launching the shirts when Tom next visits America in February.
The market for $3000 English suits is pretty limited. A couple of thousand of people, tops. But the potential market for Engish shirts is much greater. Look at Thomas Pink.
Our plan is basically to offer a shirt of a higher quality than Pink's, at much lower overheads for us.
We're thinking about ways to scale the business upwards. We're going to do it all via online to begin with. If it goes well we'll see if it warrants opening an offline operation [selling in retail outlets].
Right now our mailing list is a few hundred people. I would like that number to reach well into five-figures before I'm done.
Even the more insane side of me thinks one hundred thousand could be doable, if we execute it well enough.
Marketing guru, entrepreneur and all-tround nethead Jack Yang finally has a blog. Worth a read.
[ALSO:] The Thora Institute, a small think-tank dedicated to "serving Black America", is also blogging.
Great Copyright rant from The Head Lemur:
Protecting stuff comes from fear. Believing that someone is out to take it, raises the question of what led you to the conclusion that whatever it is has such a potential for destroying your way of life? And since you have reached this conclusion, where did the idea come from to put it on the web?
It's official: Stormhoek is coming to America in March.
[NOTE TO SELF:] How do I ruthlessly exploit this for personal gain?
[ALSO:] I was in Maryport earlier today. I actually saw the now-famous dolphin swimming around. Poor creature.

1. A well known writer has a website. Been online for a number of years. Already has a reputation for being tech-savvy and "wired".
2. He starts a blog just over 2 weeks ago.
3. It increases his traffic. Just a tad.
4. Make of it what you will.

So what happens to marketing now that we have all this jolly post-Cluetrain action happening? Read this great post from Tara Hunt.
I particularly like Point Number Six:
6. A good marketer gets involved in the community.I've tried taking a similar aproach with Stormhoek and how it interfaces with the blogging/Web 2.0 crowd.I'm not just talking throwing a few dollars of sponsorship in their general direction in exchange for a banner. I'm talking about getting your hands dirty. Getting involved. Taking up the cause for yourself. Starting initiatives. Supporting initiatives. Getting to know everyone.
Who says Web 2.0 is just about internet technology? Who says wine is just about fermented grape juice? Where are the edges? The fun thing about the Stormhoek project is that I get to find out.
[UPDATE:] Taras's follow-up post on Point Number Six: "How how does a marketer get involved in the community without it being a bullshit PR move?"
[Here's a pic of me and Tara in London last month.]

The fifth TechCrunch Meetup is on Friday, February 17, 2006 at the TechCrunch house in Atherton, California. We will celebrate the launch of Naked Conversations, the new book by Shel Israel and Robert Scoble.I've already read Naked Conversations, thanks to their publishers kindly giving me an advance copy to read. It's a great book. [Amazon link here.]
I get asked this all the time: "Yeah, I'm sure blogging is great and all, but how can it make a difference to MY business?"
And Robert and Shel's book address this question better than anyone I know about.
The thing is, there's no one single answer. Every business has its own issues.
My standard answer these days is, Forget blogging for the minute. Think instead about "The Smarter Conversation".
[Disclosure:] The "English Cut" story get a lot of ink in the book. That's thanks mainly to Shel, who followed the story closely from pretty much Day One. Thanks, Shel!

Go back to my New York days in the late 1990s, long before I had my own website.
If I found a cool website or product, I'd tell, I dunno, maybe a few people about it. Maybe a dozen.
Now when I find something I like and I blog about it, hundreds, maybe thousands of people find out. And a lot of the people I tell have blogs of their own. So that thousands of folk might cascade into tens of thousands quite easily.
In short, my 5-year-old Dell and a simple piece of free blogging software has upped my "viral effect" by many tens of thousands of percentage points since New York. And the same has happened for thousands upon thousands of other people. Some more than me, some less, but still, collectively it's huge.
Whatever business you're in, your product's success or failure is going to become more and more dependant on "sneezers" like me. We are not going away. We are getting more viral by the day, while other ways of spreading ideas- TV, newspapers etc- are becoming less effective by the day.
This steady transfer of power and influence from big media to the sneezers won't happen overnight, but it is a permanent state of affairs.
And there is nothing, repeat nothing you can do about it.
Doc Searls said back in April that The Cluetrain hasn't left the station yet. Doc Searls was wrong.

Forget power laws, A-Lister oligarchies, The Long Tail, The Cluetrain, The Hughtrain, Citizen's Media, or any ideas of meritocracy, fraternity, democracy, equality or fairness.
The Two Immutable Laws of Blogging:
1. "Nobody's going to read your blog unless there's something in it for them." -Seth Godin.Any questions?2. "Nobody's going to link to your blog unless there's something in it for them." -Hugh MacLeod
[NOTE TO SELF:] Diversity. Freedom of Choice. Equality. Pick Two.
[NOTE TO SELF:] Paraphrasing Ben Hammersley: "Though markets may be conversations, conversations are also markets."
Here's a term I just coined:
"A-Listology". The study of "A-Listers", and the social dynamics that go with them.
Often confused with useful and original thought.
[Bonus Link:] Tom Wark, one of the best wine bloggers out there, does a great job fisking the Stormhoek story.
Decanter Magazine writes about the "Blogging Doubles Stormhoek Wine" story.
And one of my favorite writers in the Blogosphere, Anil Dash writes about it on the Six Apart Blog:
Last year, Stormhoek, a popular South African wine, started a business blog powered by Movable Type and sent out one hundred complimentary bottles of their wine to bloggers across Europe. With the assistance of well-known blog marketing expert Hugh Macleod, Stormhoek bet big on blogging, counting on the influence and voice of those bloggers to help get their message out.The result? As you can see in Hugh's Movable Type-powered blog and in today's story on Decanter magazine's website, Stormhoek doubled sales of their wines.
PS. You should read the blog post Anil wrote the week after he got married. Possibly the most moving blog post I read in 2005.
PPS. Anil wouldn't know this, but it was him who got me using Movable Type. Long before he went to work for Six Apart [the company that makes MT software], I read his blog avidly; I was a real fan. Noticing that he was an MT user, I said to myself, "Good enough for Anil, good enough for me." This was the first time I ever came across MT. True Story.
"Blogs are about being changed, more than changing others."
This what I mean when I'm talking about "Internal Disruption".
Johnnie Moore, in my opinion is one of the most lucid voices out there, when it comes to new ways to think about marketing. I consider him currently the best "marketing blogger" in the UK. I hope you'll add him to your blogroll.
[Bonus Link:] Me and Dennis "Don't shoot me because I'm an accountant" Howlett are having an interesting exchange over here in the comment section.

TOP TEN REASONS WHY NOBODY READS YOUR BLOG:
1. You're not a good-looking female who likes posting naked pictures of herself.
Pretty damn obvious, if you ask me. [Not safe for work. You've been warned.]
2. There's nothing in it for them.
Yeah, people really want to spend the short time they've been given on this Earth to find out what an unemployed managing consultant dork has to say. Dream on.
3. "Passion & Authority" are just buzzwords to you.
Yeah, I've read the Cluetrain as well. So has my pet canary. Get back in line.
4. A secret cabal of A-Listers got together and decided that you should be excluded from the conversation.
Yeah, they sit around sipping champagne, eating caviar and laughing about you.
5. You have nothing to say.
The fact that you haven't figured this out yet surprises everyone.
6. You're not The Assimilated Negro.
TAN is smart and funny. You are not. Get over it.
7. You didn't recently sell your company to AOL for $25 million.
Somehow your eighth-grade English teacher managed to convince you that truth & beauty were more important to people than money & power. And you've been paying dearly for it ever since.
8. The very fact that you're whining about traffic makes people not want to read your blog.
Instead it makes them want to emulate the champagne-swigging A-Listers currently mocking you.
9. You've only been writing the damn thing for a week.
And you're already whinging. See Point Number Eight.
10. The Long Tail is very, very long.
And thanks to folk like you it's getting EVEN LONGER. Rock on.
[FURTHER READING:] "Top Ten Blogger Lies."
[BONUS LINK:] Kent has a very different take on things.

Stormhoek is looking for a marketing guy with consumer goods experience to help create and execute in-store promotions with some of the large UK retailers.
This is not my field at all. Anybody know someone who might be interested? Please e-mail me with "marketing gig" in the title. Thanks.
It just occured to me- gapingvoid will be five years old in a couple of months. Wow. That seems like a long time.
It first started life as place to publish my cartoons [Click here to see the old site.]. Then it evolved into a kind of marketing, "Hughtrain" blog.
Then English Cut and Stormhoek came along in 2005 and changed everything once again.
Went from "cartoonist" to "copywriter" to "marketing consultant" to "entrerpeneur" in a few short moves.
I like it when a blog re-invents itself, my own or someone else's. When that happens, career re-invention inevitably follows in its wake. And to me that's what blogging is really all about.
Who said companies never listen to bloggers?
This is about as good an example as I've seen lately. Thanks for the heads-up, Markoos!
NB: You need to read the comments to get the full story.
Congrats to rememberthemilk for getting a clue.
[Bonus Link:] Ignore the "Long Tail" at your peril etc.
Sarah Blow, everybody's favorite girl geek is looking for a job.
She told me it was OK to post this, though for whatever reason her current employer won't let her post it on her blog.
She's 24 and very, very bright. She tells me she's not adverse to the idea of moving, even moving countries. Here's her CV.
I told her she should move to Seattle and go work for Microsoft. Robert?
English Cut has now added a monthly newsletter to the equation.
A lot of people have signed up so far. A couple of hundred in the last day or two. I'm hoping we can add a couple of zeros to the final number.
We see it as a good way to touch base with our customers, let them know what we're up to etc, without them having to read the blog on a regular basis [not everybod wants to read blogs, believe it or not].
Sure, there's nothing too radical about this approach. It's just straight ahead "Permission Marketing". That being said, it does excite me. I really like the idea of being able to find all the business you need, just from the simple act of writing an engaging e-mail every month and sending it out to a willing audience [working in tandem with the blog, of course].
Beats the hell out of conventional advertising, which I usually find slow, complicated, inefficient, painful and expensive.
Please feel free to sign up. Thanks.

It was funny walking down Savile Row yesterday. There were a lot of "SALE" signs in the windows. It's January, post-Christmas etc, so it wasn't exactly surprising. But this month we've been turning down business. And thinking about raising our prices. When others zig, zag. Exactly.
Thomas and I were down in London this week visiting shirtmakers, to make for us wholesale.
We've found somebody. And they're bloody good. And we like them. And they also supply my favorite Jermyn Street shirtmaker. And the shirts are all made in England, unlike SOME nameless Jermyn Street companies that manufacure in India, Portugal, Pakistan and China.
[NB: Jermyn Street is to hand-made shirts what Savile Row is to hand-made suits. They're a few minutes' walk from each other.]
I was holding a competitor's shirt in my hands yesterday.
1. The company's illustrious name was proudly emblazened on the collar label.Not that there's anything wrong with having a Chinese shirt. The quality in this case was high, and the cost was very competitive.
2. "Jermyn Street" was proudly emblazoned on the collar label.
3. The "Made In China" bit was not-so-proudly emblazoned on a tiny, hard-to-find label nowhere near the collar.
But we think our customers want the "Made In England" story. So do we. Sure, it's going to cost more, but we think it makes the "English Cut" story more authentic. And "Authenticity" is what people are ultimately buying into, not the actual molecules.
As soon as you start cutting corners, you start cutting into your own narrative. Sometimes the cost savings justify it, but not always. The world is already awash with compromised stories and diluted brands. Sure, the accountants love it, but they're just looking at the numbers. They're not the ones who have to go out into the big, wide world and find the actual paying customers.

I'm currently in London, back home tonight.
It looks like Stormhoek will be spending more marketing efforts in the USA starting this year, which might mean I get to spend more time in New York, after a few years away from my most beloved city.
Also, there's some interesting things happening with English Cut on the company front. Since most of our customers are American, I can't see not spending more time over there for that as well.
I've no real interest in living there full-time again [Honest!]. I'm not Wall Street material, nor does Big Media or Madison Avenue do much for me these days. Right now I'm thinking a few days every month or so would be good, not unlike the frequency I currently visit Paris and London.
It's funny, even five years ago doing what I'm doing outside a big city would be nearly impossible. But the blogosphere changed everything.
A $5000-a-month Tribeca loft is far less appealing when you don't actually have to live there in order to get ahead.
But yet, in spite of the internet making things possible for so many people near and far, the property prices in New York, London and other central hubs do nothing except rise. And rise fiercely.
What's going on? The Pre-Cluetrain crowd having one last gasp before the party ends?

More coverage on the "Blogging Doubles Stormhoek Sales" story.
So you want to know "What comes after Cluetrain"?
The stumbling block to "markets as conversations" for most companies is that they see a world in which only one of the participants in the interaction is open to change. This would be the customer, by default -- they are the ones who are putting their money down and making room in their lives for your product. The company providing the product has historically not been open to change in the process.The next step for Cluetrain, as this article discusses, is companies willingly allowing themselves to be genuinely disrupted by the process.
Johnnie Moore also has some good thoughts on it:
There's a parallel at work for bloggers - the value may not be the immediate impact of their words on the market, but how the conversation changes the blogger.The best example I can think of is how Robert Scoble and his blogging colleagues are changing Microsoft internally.
But Microsoft is a tech company. What I'm not seeing is more non-tech companies following their lead. I guess it's not surprising.
A year ago, I was very excited by the idea of corproate blogging, spreading like wildfire. But the more I've talked to large companies over the last 12 months, the less I'm convinced they actually want to get into the process.
For all the "Blaze New Trails" rheotoric the corporate PR machine likes to feed the media, most corporate types don't like rocking the boat. And good blogs rock boats- they can't help it.
So what comes after The Cluetrain? Companies gladly and willingly allowing themselves to be actually changed by The Cluetrain. But don't hold your breath.
[FURTHER READING:] "Disrupt Or Die."

1. I don't consider myself an A-Lister.
No, but I turn up for speaking gigs at all the big conferences anyway. Uh-huh.
2. I don't care about traffic.
Of course I don't. Even though I'm a freelance consultant, and my blog is my primary way of marketing myself. Rock on.
3. I've read your blog.
Yeah, well I read the "Musings of an unemployed tech consultant" bit on the title bar, before clicking off. That counts.
4. I started blogging back in 1999.
Of course, back in 1999 a Flash-animated, brochureware homepage was considered a blog. Kinda sorta.
5. My blog has no commercial agenda.
I'm far too sexy to care about money. Exactly.
6. I only have advertising on my blog as an experiment.
That explains why the adstrip is right under the "Musings of an unemployed tech consultant" bit. Indeed.
7. I've never liked the unegalitarian term, "A-Lister".
Even though I am one. Oh, the irony.
8. I'm proud to be a D-Lister.
Even though I spend 7 hours a day writing the thing. Right.
9. He's a big hero of mine.
He's got more traffic than downtown Mexico City and I'm hoping to God he links to me one day.
10. I really admire what she's doing for the blogosphere.
I've noticed that she's currently single.
[Inspired by Mr. Kawasaki, of course.]
[BONUS LINK:] "Top Ten Reasons Why Nobody Reads Your Blog."
![]()
I'll be speaking at Lift in Geneva, February 2-3.
Robert Scoble, Cory Doctorow, Anina and Euan Semple will also be there. Rock on.
From my best estimates, I'd say at least 90% of English Cut's paying customers have never heard of or read gapingvoid.
What does that tell me? That blogging doesn't work in the cause-and-effect way a lot of people think it does.
Indirectly. Blogs are a great way to make things happen indirectly.
But so many people live or die by metrics and "deliverables", they can't get their head around that.

[This cartoon is one of my all-time favorites. Which is why I repost it all the time etc.]
Back when I was new to this whole internet thing, I would check my stats at least once a day. Now I'm lucky if I check them once a week, tops. Stats don't really tell you that much. OK, so let's say hypothetically you got 30% more vi