January 20, 2006

once upon a time...

zzzzsteak20.jpg

1. A well known writer has a website. Been online for a number of years. Already has a reputation for being tech-savvy and "wired".

2. He starts a blog just over 2 weeks ago.

3. It increases his traffic. Just a tad.

4. Make of it what you will.

Posted by hugh macleod at January 20, 2006 4:38 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Being featured on the Typepad homepage for two weeks results in a traffic spike? Well, that's shocking.

Posted by: Karim Bakhtiar at January 20, 2006 6:19 PM

But you didn't just start blogging this month, so the reason your own traffic increased just a tad this January?

Posted by: Gripes at January 20, 2006 6:50 PM

Not only on the Typepad website but, I believe, even the BBC had an article about Guy Kawasaki's blog. It's all over the net.

Posted by: Andreas Duess at January 20, 2006 7:07 PM

> Being featured on the Typepad homepage for two
> weeks results in a traffic spike? Well,
> that's shocking.

Would he have been featured on the Typepad homepage for two weeks if he didn't have a blog?

Douglas

Posted by: Douglas Livingstone at January 20, 2006 10:07 PM

the traffic spike was due to the "free toaster with book purchase!" banner. what? are you people blind?

(ps- i'm highly entertained by your doodles...you are one talented creature...love this blog)

Posted by: G.D. at January 20, 2006 11:24 PM

Hugh Macleod is my hero, " Final decision "

Posted by: AGRADA at January 21, 2006 12:00 AM

Would Guy Kawasaki have been featured on the Typepad home page if he or his work had not been well known? Obviously not.

The traffic stats do not demonstrate that blogging is a more powerful traffic generator than being associated with something well-known as the association was a necessary condition for the free listing that led to the traffic spike.

The implication that famous people could leverage their existing fame through blogging is hardly a revelation.

Posted by: Karim Bakhtiar at January 21, 2006 9:01 PM

Karim, I'm getting the feeling that this is turning into one of those "The only reason The Rolling Stones got successful is because they sold millions of records and concert tickets" types of conversation. Heh.

Posted by: hugh macleod at January 22, 2006 2:19 PM

Actually, the reason the Rolling Stones became succesful is that they toured as the warmup act for the Trashmen and thus came to a lot of people's attention.

Posted by: triticale at January 23, 2006 12:50 AM